The Next New KiwiSaver*

*(like the next new Whole Earth Catalogue)

In New Zealand we have a pension plan called KiwiSaver. It was set up as a long term saving plan.  With a couple of notable exceptions, it can only be accessed by the contributor at retirement.  You would think that since it is meant to be from when you start work, to the age of 65, there would be great reluctance to change it by successive governments.  Of course, no one would object to a change for the better.  But No, the present National Government (on the right) has already made a couple of changes, neither of them beneficial to the participant.

National has now announce that at the coming budget they will make some further changes to KiwiSaver.  The first part of this blog is being written before these announcements.  The second part will be after they come out.

Part 1
I have long argued that KiwiSaver, in its present form is a scam.  I define a scam as a system that makes the mark think he is getting something for nothing and hence make him willing to part with his money.  My objections to Kiwi Saver in its present form are the following

Firstly, the government contributes a matching amount up to a little over a thousand dollars a year.  Sounds good doesn't it.  But whose money is this they are giving you.  You guessed it.  It is your money, previously collected through taxes with the act of collection siphoning part of it off*.   If the government incurs this added expense  it has three options.  It can a) raise taxes, it can b) reduce services or it can c) borrow more money resulting in us and future generations of Kiwis going further into debt. Note that in this connection, we are at present borrowing huge amounts of money sometimes quoted at about $300m per week and our GST has just gone up from 12.5% to 15%.

*People are needed to administrate the collection and distribution of taxes.  The more different taxes you collect and the more different ways you distribute it, the more people you need.  Lets say, for the sake of argument, tax collection is 90% efficient.  That means for every $1000 you collect you only have $900 in the government coffers for doing the government work.

My second objection is the employee contribution.  Any CEO worth his inflated salary will simply calculate how much the great privilege of having you work for him is worth and deduct the KiwiSaver contribution from your salary.  Again making you think you are getting something for nothing.

My third objection and the way KiwiSaver could be made worthwhile without the bribes is as follows.

At present KiwiSaver contributions are after taxes.  If you are in the 33% tax bracket, you have to earn $150 in order to have $100 to contribute.  This means you already start well behind the starting line.  The interest on your KiwiSaver investment has to get you back up to $150 before you even start to get ahead*.

*I can just hear the critics say, but you are getting capital gains.  I don't know what you think but I am a little jaded with the promise of long term capital gains after that events of the last few years.

You are also taxed on dividends and interest and to add insult to injury, you are taxed on the whole amount you earn, not the part that is above inflation.  Who controls inflation.  There are many outside influences but in so far as it can, the government does.  We have about 3% inflation in New Zealand so at the end of the first year with your investment of $100, you have to have $103 in the bank just to have the same buying power.  Your dividends are also taxed at your marginal rate so if you get an investment that earns 6%, you have $106 at the end of the year.  Since you have earned $6, you are taxed $2.  You are left with $104.  This is a real earning of only $1 on an investment of $100.  It turns out that at this 1% true interest*, it will take you about 40 years to get back to the buying power of the original $150 that you earned.

*It is actually 0.97% interest but let's not quibble

Clearly the solution is   a) to let you invest before taxes and  b) to be allowed tokeep your earnings or at the very least, pay tax on your true earnings.

End of part 1.  We wait in great anticipation for the announcement.

Part 2 
We now have the new version.  The government contribution is halved and the minimum contribution from the worker and his boss is 3% rather than 2%.  The government contribution is still a fiction.  They are taking money from us in taxes so that they can give it back in KiwiSaver.  The Employer contribution is still a fiction.  Your boss will still reduce your salary (or not let it rise as fast as it otherwise would) so he can pay this contribution and for the individual, the scheme is less worthwhile an investment.  No reduction in taxation on the portion you contribute has been made and your dividends and interest are still taxed at your marginal rate with no allowance made for inflation.  Not a pretty picture.

German FIT system - Brilliant

You have to admire the German government* and its Tax Department. Not only do they not themselves financially support the introduction of small scale renewable energy in Germany, they manage to tax it 6 or 7 times. This may seem a little surprising to you considering how the German FIT (feed in tariff) system is always held up as an example of how to increase the uptake of small scale solar-electric systems. And, don't misunderstand me. It has been tremendously successful. The generation from small solar electric systems in Germany is now almost equivalent to five large coal powered generating units and is increasing day by day. Lets have a closer look at how it work.

*I have started with the German system as it is the most insidious.  At the bottom there is a link to our New Zealand system.  There are almost an infinitely varied number of systems which can be used in terms of the regulatory framewrod that surrounds it.  Each one has it's own fish hooks.

The German government is not involved in financing solar-electric systems. The money to pay the small generator for every kWh he produces* is raised by the German Power companies charging all its customers a little more for the power they buy. Here is the first level of taxation. German VAT (sales tax) is just under a fifth so when you pay your power bill, a fifth is added to the charge and this goes to the German government. Toooo clever!! Remember, the power company is allowed to charge a little extra to all its customers to pay the FITs so all its customers pay a fifth of this little bit extra as Sales tax. It is only a little per customer but remember that in total it is equal to a fifth of the sale price of the power generated by 5 large coal powered generating stations.

*For the early adopter of a solar electric system, it is fantastic, at least for the first 20 years.  The FIT is over 50c for the first 20 years since installation.  At each year later that you install your panels, the amount you get per kWh over the first 20 years is less.

Then the government insists on double metering. All the power that the small generator/customer produces goes through one meter and everything he uses through the second meter. This seems at first glance to be very beneficial to the small generator. Since he receives approximately three times the rate for the power he produces than for the power he buys he is very pleased that all the power he produces is measured rather than the excess above what he uses. This way he gets the maximum return??? Are you ever suspicious when something seems too good to be true?

Since the small generator/customer is earning revenue from his solar panels and the amount is recorded by the power company, it is visible to the tax office and this amount is added to the income of the small generator. He is than taxed on this revenue at his marginal income tax rate*.  For a really well off German, and with the reunification tax,  this is over 50%. In other words, if a high salaried German earns 200euro per month from his power generation, he gets to keep only 100euro.

*  In most countries you are taxed at a certain rate for the first part of your income, a larger rate on the next portion and a higher rate on the rest of your income.  Let's say for the sake of the argument that it is 20% on the first thousand, 30% on the next thousand and 40% on anything above 2000 per month.  40% is your marginal tax rate and any additional income you acquire will be taxed at this rate.

Then the tax office looks at how much power the owner of solar panels buys. Remember, this is all the power he uses. Not just the extra he needs to make up his shortfall. Whatever you buy in Germany, including power, has sales tax attached to it and sales tax, as we said, in Germany it is just under a fifth. Suppose our same well off German buys 200euro of power. Once you have added VAT, he has to pay 240euro for it. The 40euro goes to the tax office. So far we are up to 3 taxations on the power produced. Now we come to the power company.

The power company earns money by selling power. The power it buys from the small generator, it sells on to its other customers. This increases its revenue and it pays tax on this added revenue at its marginal tax rate. It also pays sales tax on power it buys.  The power is taxed once more and since the power company has to make a profit, it passes on this added expense to its customers.  This added cost is also taxed.  We now have a tax on a tax.  (or is it a tax on a tax on a tax.  I am loosing track of all the compounding going on)

As I said, you have to admire the system. At a time when the world is desperate to replace fossil fuel power generation with renewables, the German government has come up with a way to increase the uptake of renewable energy, have a sixtiple dipping system of taxing every kWh of renewable power produced and gain the gratitude of its citizens and the admiration of the world. Machiavelli would be all a twitter. Imagine how much less expensive it would be for the installer of small generation equipment if it wasn't taxed this way; how much more worthwhile it would be to install such a system and how much less expensive power would be for  German consumers that don't have solar panels.  Imagine how much better if the German Government simply put in a system for the benefit of the German citizen.

One wonders what all this extra revenue is used for. If the German government ear-marks (ring fences) this money for installing wind turbines, making home solar equipment less expensive, subsidising house insulation etc. etc. the system would be justified in terms of the big picture of replacing fossil fuel generation by renewables. I wonder. That would be another story.

In another blog, I calculated that the small customer who installs solar panels would have to install a system between 1.7 to 4 times as big as he actually needs  to generate the power he uses if he wanted to end up paying nothing for his electricity.  This is, of course, only if double metering is the law of the land.  The wide range depends to a large extent on your tax status and the tax laws of your country.  Guess what extra you pay when you buy your solar system.  That's right.  GST.  So you pay even more tax to the government in order to buy a system which is far bigger than you actually need.  How many taxations are we up to now.  I have lost track.

Note that in New Zeland we have double metering but it only measures the excess and shorfall after you use your own generated power.  For a look at this system, click here.